By the time the Continental Congress set its mind to declare American independence in the summer of 1776, the American Revolution was well underway. Its political, economic, and cultural causes unfolded alongside rapid developments in the study of “natural philosophy"—the 18th century precursor to what we now think of as “science.”
The American Philosophical Society emerged in 1743, in part, from a sense that American colonials had something to contribute to these investigations. In the absence of more formal scientific institutions during the colonial and revolutionary periods, early membership organizations like the APS played a critical role in facilitating exchanges that cut across fields such as astronomy, botany, chemistry, zoology, and geology (to name only a few) both within North America and throughout the Atlantic world. In turn, these exchanges informed the rhetoric of the American Revolution, developments in medicine and disease control bolstered the American military effort, and research in experimental science helped shape public opinion about what the colonies could accomplish on their own. As observed by early American historian of science and former APS Librarian and Executive officer Whitfield Bell, Jr.: “Philosophers of the early republic…clearly understood the interrelation of science and the rest of their civilization. They believed that the fact of political independence called on them in a special way to study those sciences and aspects of science that were peculiarly American.”
“America’s Scientific Revolutionaries” takes Bell’s point as its main premise and sets out to identify and profile individuals who participated in and contributed to this scientific network. While sometimes seen as provincials by their European counterparts, early American natural philosophers–gentlemen farmers, clergyman, and officeholders–pursued observation, built instruments, and published results—sharing work through the APS and the transatlantic print world. The archival record that work produced is extraordinary—and unwieldy. Members and their friends, wives, and sisters were polymaths who dabbled in this and that, whose very natures let alone many interests defy easy categorization. This project aspires to spur renewed interest in the vast archive of their lives preserved over centuries within the American Philosophical Society, and demonstrates how America’s earliest scientific thinkers helped shape a distinct national identity rooted in Enlightenment commitments to reason, empiricism, and innovation.
Reference:
Whitfield J. Bell, Jr. Early American Science: Needs and Opportunities for Study. Williamsburg, VA: Institute of Early American History and Culture, 1955.
